Saints' Discussion Forums
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 15, 2025, 12:46:09 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
* Home Help Calendar Mailbox Quotes Prayers Books Login Register
Saints' Discussion Forums  |  Forums  |  Pro-Life News & Talk  |  Topic: Clarification on what the ERA Amendment says and Women legal status 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Clarification on what the ERA Amendment says and Women legal status  (Read 243 times)
curious
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 13


View Profile
« on: April 20, 2025, 09:23:28 PM »

US women still not equal before the eyes of the Law....thanks to the former President   . A Month before he was to leave office Biden was
Petitioned by 150 Senators to Certify the 28th Amendment. He did so on January 17,2025  in Office; however the Archvist of the National Archives Dr. Colleen Shogan  refused to write up the Amendment [ Biden did not direct Shogan to publish the amendment.]; in her appoiment May 10 ,2023 Shogan had stated her prejudiced attitude that she would not publish the Equal Rights Amendment as part of the United States Constitution, stating that the job of the archivist is to publish constitutional amendments following proper ratification, not to decide when an amendment is published; she was removed from office 7 February 2025. However her acting successor William J. Bosanko has also refused to publish the Equal Rights Amendment on the same hypocritical whining lying excuses stating that neither they, nor Joe Biden could act without congressional or legal action lifting the ratification deadline.” (Ironically Biden in a speech blamed Trump for not seeing the ERA Amendment through and claimed that it should go through although as facts show, he did nothing to see that it became law)  ,,,,,Bidden  no actions are  a memorial to Phyllis Schlafly hypocrital whining lying that publishing the ERA Amendment would force women into combat, legalize gay marriage and erode gender roles. In 2020 conservatives  made a claim that ERA would require taxpayer-funded abortions. In fact  The Era States  "Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State on account of sex." The ERA gives Congress the power to enforce this proscription against gender discrimination. The ERA has nothing to do with abortion rights for women In fact  the US Supreme Court declared on the issue of abortions would be decided by the each State Legislature weather to approve or deny abortions despite Biden’s illegeal attempts to make Abortation rights the perogitve of the US Government not the voting rights of each state.  Also noted are  the facts that women enlisted in the military under their own choice; and as for the erosion of gender roles. Under  Obuma homosexual “marriages” were deemed legal; indeed Obuma became the foremost advocate of homosexualty not just in the United States but the entire world; Biden became the foremost advocate of abortion not just in the United States but the entire world. Indeed In fact under “..The Biden Administration's National Strategy on Gender Equity and Equality aims to erase policies that respect the biological differences between men and women..” Lips Sealed Tongue Cry Angry Huh? Huh?
« Last Edit: April 23, 2025, 05:25:50 AM by curious » Logged
curious
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 13


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 04, 2025, 07:49:29 AM »

The purpose of the ERA is to guarantee equal legal rights for all American citizens regardless of sex. In the early history of the Equal Rights Amendment, middle-class women were largely supportive, while those speaking for the working class were often opposed, arguing that women should hold more domestic responsibility than men and that employed women needed special protections regarding working conditions and employment hours. Proponents asserted it would end legal distinctions between men and women in matters including divorce, property, and employment. Opponents have argued that it would remove protections from women and open women to be drafted into the military.

The 14th Amendment, providing an equal protection clause to all U.S. citizens, was not originally intended to apply to women, as it predates the 19th Amendment. As proof of this, Susan B. Anthony voted in the 1872 presidential election, was arrested two weeks later, and was convicted the following year for illegal voting. At her trial, she attempted to use the 14th Amendment to defend her actions, but the judge ruled that the amendment did not apply to her because she was a woman.
The Equal Rights Amendment would prevent a rollback of the legal advances women have gained. It is important to remember that as governments change from conservative to liberal, citizens, neither male nor female, should not be subject to lose their right to vote, their right to free speech, or any other of their constitutional rights due to a change of political opinion.
The ERA does not add new laws to the U.S. Constitution, it only guarantees the rights currently within it. Issues like abortion, same-sex marriage, unisex bathrooms, and the female draft exist separately from the ERA and would not become law upon the ERA’s passage.
The ERA is an amendment for both men and women – it is not just a woman’s issue. Issues of custody, employment, and fair wages are important to both sexes and an Equal Rights Amendment would guarantee equal legal rights without regard to sex.
The ERA would affirm the purpose that began with the writing of the U.S. Constitution, the basic human right of constitutional protection.


The Above is from the Alice Paul Center for Gender Justice website ..and is given here only to explain what the ERA AMendment says in regard to Woemen rights....to correct in legal ineaquilty which has existed since 1920-105 years Lips Sealed Tongue Huh? Huh?

In regard that hystircal argument if the ERA was passed women would be drafted into the Miltiary....Women are  voluntary enlisting in the Military witout being drafted
Also to the Hystrical argument that the ERA is Proaboration ...in fact the US Supreme Court ruled that it is up to each state..not the Federal Goverment to decided to be either anti-aboration or proaboration...the ERA has nothing to do with aboration but  The ERA does not add new laws to the U.S. Constitution, it only guarantees the rights currently within it. see In its 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, ruling that the U.S. Constitution does not guarantee a federal right to abortion. This decision effectively returned the regulation of abortion to individual states, meaning each state now has the power to determine its own abortion policies.
As for the erosion of Gender roles.... Obuma became the foremost advocate of homosexualty not just in the United States but the entire world; Biden became the foremost advocate of abortion not just in the United States but the entire world....[Christain science monitor]
The Christian Science Monitor did report on President Obama's administration's efforts to promote LGBT rights and human rights globally, including advocating for the decriminalization of homosexuality in foreign countries. Diplomats were instructed to raise the issue with foreign governments and to advocate for the protection of LGBT individuals.
The Christian Science Monitor reported that President Biden has directed U.S. diplomats to pressure countries to adopt policies on abortion similar to those in the United States. This order comes as the Biden administration seeks to expand access to abortion services both domestically and internationall

LAstly the US COnsitution writes of trial by Jury....yet one of the most abused portions was the riegn of Judge Lynch Law,,,of Lynching without trial against persons accused of crimes...{According to the NAACP records] the worst years of "Lynch Law " was 1890) in 1909 a Afrian American Congressman proposed a Federal Anti Lynching Law....which was passed 115 years later in 2024...delibertly keeping female citizens legally inferior by denying them full equal rights  civil Rights...is the last gasp "triumph" of a mean stupid.selfish .inferior mindset..as long as the inequality remains...equal civil rights for all us Citizens....will always be in jeopardy...who want to turn the United states  back to 1900   Tongue Tongue Tongue Angry Angry Angry
« Last Edit: May 04, 2025, 09:07:37 PM by curious » Logged
Shin
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 21781



View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: May 05, 2025, 02:53:47 PM »

What do you think will change if the ERA is enacted, what will it be different in actual practice than it is today?
Logged

'Flores apparuerunt in terra nostra. . . Fulcite me floribus. (The flowers appear on the earth. . . stay me up with flowers. Sg 2:12,5)
curious
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 13


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: May 06, 2025, 08:29:33 AM »

It will be a trimph for removing 102 years old legal inequalty...of US citizens who have been discrimiated against becuase of their Gender...... Grin Cheesy Little Angel crucifix a trumph over a petty stupid mindset,,,,,,of keeping women down....
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
Saints' Discussion Forums  |  Forums  |  Pro-Life News & Talk  |  Topic: Clarification on what the ERA Amendment says and Women legal status « previous next »
Jump to:  



Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines