Key Pro-Life Actions and Victories in 2025:
Federal Policy Changes:
End to Federal Funding of Abortion: The White House issued an executive order to end the use of federal taxpayer dollars to fund or promote elective abortions, enforcing the Hyde Amendment and related laws.
Defunding of Planned Parenthood: A massive spending bill was passed that banned Planned Parenthood from receiving federal Medicaid funds for a year, a move celebrated by anti-abortion groups.
Supreme Court Decisions:
Medina v. Planned Parenthood: The Supreme Court delivered a pro-life victory in the case of Medina v. Planned Parenthood, allowing states to exclude abortion providers from their Medicaid programs.
Continued Focus on State-Level Restrictions: The Supreme Court's decisions continued to empower states to regulate or ban abortion, leading to further restrictions in various parts of the country.
State-Level Actions:
Expanding Shield Laws: States worked to expand "shield laws" to protect individuals and healthcare providers from federal actions aimed at restricting abortion access.
Funding for Abortion and Contraception: States also worked to ensure funding for abortion and contraception services, as well as to enact state-level health care data privacy protections.
Project 2025:
Impact on Abortion Access: Project 2025, a detailed plan for the next presidential administration, outlines a comprehensive strategy to severely restrict abortion access nationwide.
Key Proposals: Project 2025 includes proposals to end medication abortion, deny emergency abortion care, restrict funding for travel to obtain abortions, and potentially criminalize abortion providers.
Weaponizing Conscience Laws: Project 2025 proposes to weaponize "conscience laws" to deny federal funding to states seeking to expand abortion access and to expand the reach of these laws to other health care areas.
Overall:
The pro-life movement achieved significant victories in 2025, including policy changes at the federal level, court decisions, and state-level actions restricting abortion access. Project 2025, if implemented, could further solidify these restrictions and reshape the landscape of abortion access in the United States.

United States: Supreme Court Delivers Another Pro-Life Victory

On June 26, 2025, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling stating that states have the constitutionally recognized authority to block state funding to abortion providers.
Catholic social teaching, which President Biden has referenced as influential in his own faith, emphasizes the dignity of human life from conception to natural death. However, some U.S. Catholic bishops and Catholic commentators have characterized President Biden as a "Cafeteria Catholic," a term used to describe Catholics who selectively adhere to some Church teachings while disregarding others.
This characterization stems primarily from President Biden's stance on abortion rights, which stands in opposition to the Catholic Church's consistent condemnation of abortion as a grave moral evil. The Catholic Church considers direct abortion, or abortion willed as an end or a means, as gravely contrary to moral law and an intrinsic evil. In fact, the Catholic Catechism states that anyone who procures a completed abortion incurs an automatic (latae sententiae) excommunication
religionnews.com website story /2025/07/30/ Evangelical legal group asks Supreme Court to overturn same-sex marriage ruling

Incidently
There's a strong argument to be made that Hitler did incur an automatic (latae sententiae) excommunication, even though he was never publicly declared excommunicated.
Here's why:
Actions that trigger latae sententiae excommunication are automatic: They take effect the moment the forbidden act is committed, without needing a formal decree from the Church.
Grave actions and excommunication: While murder itself doesn't automatically trigger excommunication, according to canon law, other crimes considered equally severe can, such as sacrilege, violence against the Pope, apostasy, heresy, or schism. It's plausible that Hitler's actions, particularly given their scale and impact, could be considered in this category.
Nazi Ideology vs. Catholic Teachings: Nazi ideology was fundamentally opposed to core Catholic teachings like solidarity and subsidiarity. Hitler's regime actively suppressed the Church and persecuted Catholics, showing contempt for the faith.
Potential for "Obstinacy in manifest grave sin": The Church could argue that Hitler's actions and ideology demonstrated an obstinate commitment to grave sin, which, depending on the specific circumstances and interpretations, could lead to automatic excommunication.
11 August 2025 saw this headline "Texas bill would allow lawsuits over shipping abortion pills"
